3 Re: The Risks of Vaccinations: NOT Child-killers - drug guide




Re: The Risks of Vaccinations: NOT Child-killers




PETER BOWDITCH 2006-04-20 05:09:44

"Jan Drew" wrote:

>
>"Arthur Brain" wrote .
>>
>> PeterB wrote:
>>> Arthur Brain wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> No, that would be you, who never provides a shred of evidence to back
>>> up anything you say.
>>
>> You are projecting again.
>
>Prove it!
>>
>>> > Smallpox was eliminated through a global vaccination program. (or maybe
>>> > that one is "under-reported", eh? You berk.)
>>>
>>> Yet another ipso facto.
>>
>> ipso facto, whoopsie doopsie...PeterB's a spastic monkey
>
>That proves nothing except you are a name caller.


Unlike people who call others "PharmaBloggers" or even "Bowshit". They
are not name-callers. They are fine people. Just ask Jan.

I love the way that when PeterB gets spanked over his ridiculous
misunderstanding of the tern "de facto" he starts using the even more
irrelevant "ipso facto". What a card!!

Is PeterB a kook? Res ipsa loquitur.



--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com


JAN DREW 2006-04-20 06:26:27


"Peter Bowditch" wrote

diversions only because Arthur had NO prove!


> "Jan Drew" wrote:
>
>>
>>"Arthur Brain" wrote .
>>>
>>> PeterB wrote:
>>>> Arthur Brain wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, that would be you, who never provides a shred of evidence to back
>>>> up anything you say.
>>>
>>> You are projecting again.
>>
>>Prove it!
>>>
>>>> > Smallpox was eliminated through a global vaccination program. (or
>>>> > maybe
>>>> > that one is "under-reported", eh? You berk.)
>>>>
>>>> Yet another ipso facto.
>>>
>>> ipso facto, whoopsie doopsie...PeterB's a spastic monkey
>>
>>That proves nothing except you are a name caller.
>
> Unlike people who call others "PharmaBloggers" or even "Bowshit". They
> are not name-callers. They are fine people. Just ask Jan.


Arthur has NO proof!
>
> I love the way that when PeterB gets spanked over his ridiculous
> misunderstanding of the tern "de facto" he starts using the even more
> irrelevant "ipso facto". What a card!!


Arthur has NO proof.....
>
> Is PeterB a kook? Res ipsa loquitur.
>
>


restore the truth that is MOST relevant, and the FACT, Peter is lying....

Prove that concomitant use of vaccine and
>> declining rates of smallpox are a product of cause and effect.
>
> You have just proven you are a complete idiot.
>
> Smallpox was eliminated (not "declining" as you idiotically claim)
> through a global vaccination program. Obviously. Der!
>
> It's action on the human body are well-studied and understood.
> The human body's reaction is also well-studied and understood.
> A vaccine was developed and it worked.
> It was then rolled out globally and it worked as designed.
> (One wonders why the entire world's trained medical experts would all
> go to so much effort if it didn't work.......).
>
> If you have a problem with any of these basic facts - design an
> experiment which will test the predicted result of smallpox vaccination
> and find it to be incorrect.
>
> Until you prove it is incorrect (one single experiment is all it takes
> to invalidate the whole theory) then it remains correct.


You have that backwards...YOU made the claim...YOU prove IT!!!!


>
> --
> Peter Bowshit












agregaty kaski uvex alveo turbosprężarka noni