Re: NO has anti-HIV/antiviral effects; DNCB induces NO

>On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:48:00 -0700, redrum1@alltel.net wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:13:46 GMT, GMCarter wrote:
>>
>>>The RE line is illustrative and you wrote it.
>>
>>No, actually I didn't write it. I merely posted it.

>>>Where is the evidence that NO always has anti-HIV effects?
>>
>>Mr. Carter, your delusional paranoia forces you into a world where
>>you need to inject "always" or "never" into everything.
>
>So you realize that NO also has HIV activating effects?

>>As to the posted evidence, if you are actually interested - which you
>>are not - go to the journals and do the research to draw whatever
>>pre-conclusion you need.
>
>What a silly statement!

>Indeed, the DNCB data I have seen to date is somewhat dismaying in
>that it appears to be relatively ineffective.

>>We are all sad that you once again refuse to accept the truth
>>which might save those who have something you don't:
>>a positive antibody test.
>
>Here you are making medical claims

>And now it appears you think that an HIV+ test result is indicative of
>something needing treatment

>If that's incorrect, by all means, feel free to clarify.

>I'm sure even your dear friend Iconoclaster is beginning to wonder at
>your disingenuous tactics and evasive maneuvering.