3 Healthy Life Expectancy Rankings marred by gluttons and lack of health care for indians - drug guide




Healthy Life Expectancy Rankings marred by gluttons and lack of health care for indians




TIGERLILLY@PRIVACY.NET.ORG.COM 2005-06-19 14:35:26







Press Release WHO
Released in Washington, D.C. and Geneva, Switzerland
4 June 2000

WHO Issues New Healthy Life Expectancy Rankings

Japan Number One in New ‘Healthy Life’ System

Japanese have the longest healthy life expectancy of 74.5 years among 191
countries, versus less than 26 years for the lowest-ranking country of Sierra
Leone, based on a new way to calculate healthy life expectancy developed by the
World Health Organization (WHO).

Previously, life expectancy estimates were based on the overall length of life
based on mortality data only.

For the first time, the WHO has calculated healthy life expectancy for babies
born in 1999 based upon an indicator developed by WHO scientists, Disability
Adjusted Life Expectancy (DALE). DALE summarizes the expected number of years to
be lived in what might be termed the equivalent of "full health." To calculate
DALE, the years of ill-health are weighted according to severity and subtracted
from the expected overall life expectancy to give the equivalent years of
healthy life.

The WHO rankings show that years lost to disability are substantially higher in
poorer countries because some limitations -- injury, blindness, paralysis and
the debilitating effects of several tropical diseases such as malaria -- strike
children and young adults. People in the healthiest regions lose some 9 percent
of their lives to disability, versus 14 percent in the worst-off countries.

In terms of DALE, the rest of the top 10 nations are Australia, 73.2 years;
France, 73.1; Sweden, 73.0; Spain, 72.8; Italy, 72.7; Greece, 72.5; Switzerland,
72.5; Monaco, 72.4; and Andorra, 72.3.

DALE is estimated to equal or exceed 70 years in 24 countries, and 60 years in
over half the Member States of WHO. At the other extreme are 32 countries where
disability-adjusted life expectancy is estimated to be less than 40 years. Many
of these are countries with major epidemics of HIV/AIDS, among other causes.

The United States rated 24th under this system, or an average of 70.0 years of
healthy life for babies born in 1999. The WHO also breaks down life expectancy
by sex for each country. Under this system, U.S. female babies could expect 72.6
years of healthy life, versus just 67.5 years for male babies.

"The position of the United States is one of the major surprises of the new
rating system," says Christopher Murray, M.D., Ph.D., Director of WHO's Global
Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. "Basically, you die earlier and spend
more time disabled if you’re an American rather than a member of most other
advanced countries."

The WHO cites various causes for why the United States ranks relatively low
among wealthy nations. These reasons include:

In the United States, some groups, such as Native Americans, rural African
Americans and the inner city poor, have extremely poor health, more
characteristic of a poor developing country rather than a rich industrialized
one.
The HIV epidemic causes a higher proportion of death and disability to U.S.
young and middle-aged than in most other advanced countries. HIV-AIDS cut three
months from the healthy life expectancy of male American babies born in 1999,
and one month from female lives;
The U.S. is one of the leading countries for cancers relating to tobacco,
especially lung cancer Tobacco use also causes chronic lung disease.
A high coronary heart disease rate, which has dropped in recent years but
remains high;
Fairly high levels of violence, especially of homicides, when compared to other
industrial countries.
All of the bottom 10 countries were in sub-Saharan Africa, where the HIV-AIDS
epidemic is rampant. In ascending order beginning with 191, those countries were
Sierra Leona, 25.9 years of healthy life for babies born in 1999; Niger, 29.1;
Malawi, 29.4; Zambia, 30.3; Botswana, 32.3; Uganda, 32.7; Rwanda, 32.8;
Zimbabwe, 32.9; Mali, 33.1; and Ethiopia, 33.5.

The overall life expectancy in sub-Saharan Africa has dropped precipitously over
the past 10 years, mostly because of the AIDS epidemic, the WHO says. Life
expectancy dropped for female babies from 51.1 years to 46.3 years. For males,
the level dropped from 47.3 years to 44.8 years.

AIDS is now the leading cause of death in Sub-Saharan Africa, far surpassing the
traditional deadly diseases of malaria, tuberculosis, pneumonia and diarrheal
disease. AIDS killed 2.2 million Africans in 1999, versus 300,000 AIDS deaths 10
years previously.

"Healthy life expectancy in some African countries is dropping back to levels we
haven’t seen in advanced countries since Medieval times," says Alan Lopez,
Coordinator of WHO’s Epidemiology and Burden of Disease Team. "This is just one
example why the WHO decided to measure healthy life expectancy for all member
countries using DALE for the first time, to give a truer picture of where good
health reigns, and where it doesn’t."

Life expectancy in several countries in southern Africa has been cut 15-20 years
off what the WHO would expect it to be in Africa without HIV. Other African
countries have lost 5-10 years of life expectancy because of HIV.

"The DALE system is simple," says Dr. Lopez. "In the old system, we measured a
total life expectancy based on the average numbers of years males and females
could expect to live in each country. However, people don’t live all those years
in perfect health. At some point in your life, you will have some level of
disability. These years with disability are weighted according to their level of
severity to estimate the total equivalent lost years of good health. You
subtract this from total life expectancy, and what remains is the expected
number of years of healthy life."

This is the first time that anyone has measured every country’s healthy life
expectancy using the DALE system.

High-ranking countries

Several factors go into making Japan number one in the rankings. One is the low
rate of heart disease, associated with the traditional low fat diet. The
national diet is changing, with high fat foods such as red meat becoming common.
The effect of tobacco has also been mild until recently, with low lung cancer
rates. These rates for men are expected to jump in coming years as the long-term
effects of the post-World War II smoking popularity begin to hit.

In Australia, smoking rates have dropped sharply from their earlier peaks,
leading to lower lung cancer and heart problem rates.

France registered high because of the health of its women, which pulled up the
overall average.

French women never smoked in any large numbers until recently. Many young French
women, however, have begun smoking, which will lead to rapid increases in lung
cancer rates and other diseases associated with tobacco in 10 to 20 years.
French men are already suffering from growing rates of these diseases from
tobacco.

Sweden ranks high because of its health care system and because tobacco use is
relatively low.

Women Living Longer, Healthier

Studies have shown consistently that as countries get richer, male mortality
tends to decline less than female mortality. This WHO study shows that the same
patterns hold when healthy life expectancies are measured.

In the early 1900s, the gap between female and male life expectancy was 2-3
years in richer countries around the world. By 1999, women were living on
average 7-8 years more than men in those same countries.

Women are generally more health conscious while in rising economies, men have
much higher smoking rates and exercise much less. Women have been living longer
and healthier lives in richer countries basically because they have always
smoked less than men, the WHO says. Women in these countries have been smoking
much more in recent years, which will translate into higher disability and death
rates in the coming years, the WHO warns. In addition, men in richer countries
tend to have poorer diets than women do, and men exercise much less than did
their grandfathers.

In poorer countries, men are victims of more disabling injuries than women. They
also get more diseases than women, for a variety of reasons.

Regional Results

North African and Middle East -- Males and females have similar levels of
healthy life expectancy, which is unusual. Also, the position of women in these
societies is often not good, Less care is given to female children, and they
have a higher risk for reproductive deaths than in other countries.

In Saudi Arabia, the overall healthy life expectancy is 64.5 years -- 65.1 for
male babies and 64.0 for female babies. In Bahrain, the overall healthy life
expectancy is 64.4, but 63.9 for male babies and 64.9 for female babies; Qatar,
63.5 overall, and 64.2 for male babies, 62.8 for females; and Kuwait, 63.2
overall, with 63.0 for male babies and 63.4 for female babies.

East Asia – China has 20 percent of the world population, so that it is of major
significance that the Chinese have a fairly good healthy life expectancy, at
62.3 years, 63.3 years for women and 61.2 for men. "This is a very impressive
performance for that level of income," says Dr. Lopez.

Russia -- Healthy life expectancy is a fair 66.4 for female babies but just 56.1
years for males. This is one of the widest sex gaps in the world. The most
common explanation is the high incidence of male alcohol abuse, which led to
high rates of accidents, violence and cardiovascular disease. From 1987 to 1994,
the risk of premature death increased by 70% for Russian males. Since 1994, life
expectancy has been improving for males.

Similar rates exist for other major countries of the former Soviet Union. In
Ukraine, female babies can expect to live an equivalent of 67.5 years of healthy
life versus 58.5 years for male babies. In Belarus, the rates are 67.2 years for
female babies and 56.2 years for male babies.

Southeast Asia -- Countries of the region have produced very mixed results. Viet
Nam has been improving dramatically in health profiles and healthy life
expectancy, rising to 58.2 years, while Thailand has not improved significantly
over the past decade, though it is still ahead of Viet Nam at 60.2 years.
Myanmar has not done very well, with a healthy life expectancy of just 52 years,
substantially behind its Southeast Asian neighbors. This shows that even
countries with the same levels of income can have very different healthy life
expectancies.

Latin America -- Cuba has the highest healthy life expectancy in the region, at
68.4 years, near U.S. levels. It is followed by Uruguay at 67.0 years; Argentina
at 66.7 years and Costa Rica at 66.7 years. Brazil is split, with a high healthy
life expectancy in its southern half, and a lower one in the north. The total
average is a relatively low 59.1 years, at 55.2 for men and 62.9 for female
babies.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Christopher Murray, M.D., Ph.D., Director of WHO's Global Programme on Evidence
for Health Policy, is available for telephone interviews on Thursday and Friday,
June 1-2. Please call 703-820-2244 to schedule time.)

Contact: Marshall Hoffman (703) 820-2244 Home (703) 533-8482



2000 Press Releases | 2000 Note for the Press
1999 Press Releases | 1999 Note for the Press |
Fact sheets
| Information Office | En français

Copyright Š WHO/OMS | Contact INF | Contact WHO




Copyright Š WHO/OMS | Contact INF | Contact WHO













Press Release WHO
Released in Washington, D.C. and Geneva, Switzerland
4 June 2000

WHO Issues New Healthy Life Expectancy Rankings

Japan Number One in New ‘Healthy Life’ System

Japanese have the longest healthy life expectancy of 74.5 years among 191
countries, versus less than 26 years for the lowest-ranking country of Sierra
Leone, based on a new way to calculate healthy life expectancy developed by the
World Health Organization (WHO).

Previously, life expectancy estimates were based on the overall length of life
based on mortality data only.

For the first time, the WHO has calculated healthy life expectancy for babies
born in 1999 based upon an indicator developed by WHO scientists, Disability
Adjusted Life Expectancy (DALE). DALE summarizes the expected number of years to
be lived in what might be termed the equivalent of "full health." To calculate
DALE, the years of ill-health are weighted according to severity and subtracted
from the expected overall life expectancy to give the equivalent years of
healthy life.

The WHO rankings show that years lost to disability are substantially higher in
poorer countries because some limitations -- injury, blindness, paralysis and
the debilitating effects of several tropical diseases such as malaria -- strike
children and young adults. People in the healthiest regions lose some 9 percent
of their lives to disability, versus 14 percent in the worst-off countries.

In terms of DALE, the rest of the top 10 nations are Australia, 73.2 years;
France, 73.1; Sweden, 73.0; Spain, 72.8; Italy, 72.7; Greece, 72.5; Switzerland,
72.5; Monaco, 72.4; and Andorra, 72.3.

DALE is estimated to equal or exceed 70 years in 24 countries, and 60 years in
over half the Member States of WHO. At the other extreme are 32 countries where
disability-adjusted life expectancy is estimated to be less than 40 years. Many
of these are countries with major epidemics of HIV/AIDS, among other causes.

The United States rated 24th under this system, or an average of 70.0 years of
healthy life for babies born in 1999. The WHO also breaks down life expectancy
by sex for each country. Under this system, U.S. female babies could expect 72.6
years of healthy life, versus just 67.5 years for male babies.

"The position of the United States is one of the major surprises of the new
rating system," says Christopher Murray, M.D., Ph.D., Director of WHO's Global
Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. "Basically, you die earlier and spend
more time disabled if you’re an American rather than a member of most other
advanced countries."

The WHO cites various causes for why the United States ranks relatively low
among wealthy nations. These reasons include:

In the United States, some groups, such as Native Americans, rural African
Americans and the inner city poor, have extremely poor health, more
characteristic of a poor developing country rather than a rich industrialized
one.
The HIV epidemic causes a higher proportion of death and disability to U.S.
young and middle-aged than in most other advanced countries. HIV-AIDS cut three
months from the healthy life expectancy of male American babies born in 1999,
and one month from female lives;
The U.S. is one of the leading countries for cancers relating to tobacco,
especially lung cancer Tobacco use also causes chronic lung disease.
A high coronary heart disease rate, which has dropped in recent years but
remains high;
Fairly high levels of violence, especially of homicides, when compared to other
industrial countries.
All of the bottom 10 countries were in sub-Saharan Africa, where the HIV-AIDS
epidemic is rampant. In ascending order beginning with 191, those countries were
Sierra Leona, 25.9 years of healthy life for babies born in 1999; Niger, 29.1;
Malawi, 29.4; Zambia, 30.3; Botswana, 32.3; Uganda, 32.7; Rwanda, 32.8;
Zimbabwe, 32.9; Mali, 33.1; and Ethiopia, 33.5.

The overall life expectancy in sub-Saharan Africa has dropped precipitously over
the past 10 years, mostly because of the AIDS epidemic, the WHO says. Life
expectancy dropped for female babies from 51.1 years to 46.3 years. For males,
the level dropped from 47.3 years to 44.8 years.

AIDS is now the leading cause of death in Sub-Saharan Africa, far surpassing the
traditional deadly diseases of malaria, tuberculosis, pneumonia and diarrheal
disease. AIDS killed 2.2 million Africans in 1999, versus 300,000 AIDS deaths 10
years previously.

"Healthy life expectancy in some African countries is dropping back to levels we
haven’t seen in advanced countries since Medieval times," says Alan Lopez,
Coordinator of WHO’s Epidemiology and Burden of Disease Team. "This is just one
example why the WHO decided to measure healthy life expectancy for all member
countries using DALE for the first time, to give a truer picture of where good
health reigns, and where it doesn’t."

Life expectancy in several countries in southern Africa has been cut 15-20 years
off what the WHO would expect it to be in Africa without HIV. Other African
countries have lost 5-10 years of life expectancy because of HIV.

"The DALE system is simple," says Dr. Lopez. "In the old system, we measured a
total life expectancy based on the average numbers of years males and females
could expect to live in each country. However, people don’t live all those years
in perfect health. At some point in your life, you will have some level of
disability. These years with disability are weighted according to their level of
severity to estimate the total equivalent lost years of good health. You
subtract this from total life expectancy, and what remains is the expected
number of years of healthy life."

This is the first time that anyone has measured every country’s healthy life
expectancy using the DALE system.

High-ranking countries

Several factors go into making Japan number one in the rankings. One is the low
rate of heart disease, associated with the traditional low fat diet. The
national diet is changing, with high fat foods such as red meat becoming common.
The effect of tobacco has also been mild until recently, with low lung cancer
rates. These rates for men are expected to jump in coming years as the long-term
effects of the post-World War II smoking popularity begin to hit.

In Australia, smoking rates have dropped sharply from their earlier peaks,
leading to lower lung cancer and heart problem rates.

France registered high because of the health of its women, which pulled up the
overall average.

French women never smoked in any large numbers until recently. Many young French
women, however, have begun smoking, which will lead to rapid increases in lung
cancer rates and other diseases associated with tobacco in 10 to 20 years.
French men are already suffering from growing rates of these diseases from
tobacco.

Sweden ranks high because of its health care system and because tobacco use is
relatively low.

Women Living Longer, Healthier

Studies have shown consistently that as countries get richer, male mortality
tends to decline less than female mortality. This WHO study shows that the same
patterns hold when healthy life expectancies are measured.

In the early 1900s, the gap between female and male life expectancy was 2-3
years in richer countries around the world. By 1999, women were living on
average 7-8 years more than men in those same countries.

Women are generally more health conscious while in rising economies, men have
much higher smoking rates and exercise much less. Women have been living longer
and healthier lives in richer countries basically because they have always
smoked less than men, the WHO says. Women in these countries have been smoking
much more in recent years, which will translate into higher disability and death
rates in the coming years, the WHO warns. In addition, men in richer countries
tend to have poorer diets than women do, and men exercise much less than did
their grandfathers.

In poorer countries, men are victims of more disabling injuries than women. They
also get more diseases than women, for a variety of reasons.

Regional Results

North African and Middle East -- Males and females have similar levels of
healthy life expectancy, which is unusual. Also, the position of women in these
societies is often not good, Less care is given to female children, and they
have a higher risk for reproductive deaths than in other countries.

In Saudi Arabia, the overall healthy life expectancy is 64.5 years -- 65.1 for
male babies and 64.0 for female babies. In Bahrain, the overall healthy life
expectancy is 64.4, but 63.9 for male babies and 64.9 for female babies; Qatar,
63.5 overall, and 64.2 for male babies, 62.8 for females; and Kuwait, 63.2
overall, with 63.0 for male babies and 63.4 for female babies.

East Asia – China has 20 percent of the world population, so that it is of major
significance that the Chinese have a fairly good healthy life expectancy, at
62.3 years, 63.3 years for women and 61.2 for men. "This is a very impressive
performance for that level of income," says Dr. Lopez.

Russia -- Healthy life expectancy is a fair 66.4 for female babies but just 56.1
years for males. This is one of the widest sex gaps in the world. The most
common explanation is the high incidence of male alcohol abuse, which led to
high rates of accidents, violence and cardiovascular disease. From 1987 to 1994,
the risk of premature death increased by 70% for Russian males. Since 1994, life
expectancy has been improving for males.

Similar rates exist for other major countries of the former Soviet Union. In
Ukraine, female babies can expect to live an equivalent of 67.5 years of healthy
life versus 58.5 years for male babies. In Belarus, the rates are 67.2 years for
female babies and 56.2 years for male babies.

Southeast Asia -- Countries of the region have produced very mixed results. Viet
Nam has been improving dramatically in health profiles and healthy life
expectancy, rising to 58.2 years, while Thailand has not improved significantly
over the past decade, though it is still ahead of Viet Nam at 60.2 years.
Myanmar has not done very well, with a healthy life expectancy of just 52 years,
substantially behind its Southeast Asian neighbors. This shows that even
countries with the same levels of income can have very different healthy life
expectancies.

Latin America -- Cuba has the highest healthy life expectancy in the region, at
68.4 years, near U.S. levels. It is followed by Uruguay at 67.0 years; Argentina
at 66.7 years and Costa Rica at 66.7 years. Brazil is split, with a high healthy
life expectancy in its southern half, and a lower one in the north. The total
average is a relatively low 59.1 years, at 55.2 for men and 62.9 for female
babies.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Christopher Murray, M.D., Ph.D., Director of WHO's Global Programme on Evidence
for Health Policy, is available for telephone interviews on Thursday and Friday,
June 1-2. Please call 703-820-2244 to schedule time.)

Contact: Marshall Hoffman (703) 820-2244 Home (703) 533-8482



2000 Press Releases | 2000 Note for the Press
1999 Press Releases | 1999 Note for the Press |
Fact sheets
| Information Office | En français

Copyright Š WHO/OMS | Contact INF | Contact WHO




Copyright Š WHO/OMS | Contact INF | Contact WHO













Press Release WHO
Released in Washington, D.C. and Geneva, Switzerland
4 June 2000

WHO Issues New Healthy Life Expectancy Rankings

Japan Number One in New ‘Healthy Life’ System

Japanese have the longest healthy life expectancy of 74.5 years among 191
countries, versus less than 26 years for the lowest-ranking country of Sierra
Leone, based on a new way to calculate healthy life expectancy developed by the
World Health Organization (WHO).

Previously, life expectancy estimates were based on the overall length of life
based on mortality data only.

For the first time, the WHO has calculated healthy life expectancy for babies
born in 1999 based upon an indicator developed by WHO scientists, Disability
Adjusted Life Expectancy (DALE). DALE summarizes the expected number of years to
be lived in what might be termed the equivalent of "full health." To calculate
DALE, the years of ill-health are weighted according to severity and subtracted
from the expected overall life expectancy to give the equivalent years of
healthy life.

The WHO rankings show that years lost to disability are substantially higher in
poorer countries because some limitations -- injury, blindness, paralysis and
the debilitating effects of several tropical diseases such as malaria -- strike
children and young adults. People in the healthiest regions lose some 9 percent
of their lives to disability, versus 14 percent in the worst-off countries.

In terms of DALE, the rest of the top 10 nations are Australia, 73.2 years;
France, 73.1; Sweden, 73.0; Spain, 72.8; Italy, 72.7; Greece, 72.5; Switzerland,
72.5; Monaco, 72.4; and Andorra, 72.3.

DALE is estimated to equal or exceed 70 years in 24 countries, and 60 years in
over half the Member States of WHO. At the other extreme are 32 countries where
disability-adjusted life expectancy is estimated to be less than 40 years. Many
of these are countries with major epidemics of HIV/AIDS, among other causes.

The United States rated 24th under this system, or an average of 70.0 years of
healthy life for babies born in 1999. The WHO also breaks down life expectancy
by sex for each country. Under this system, U.S. female babies could expect 72.6
years of healthy life, versus just 67.5 years for male babies.

"The position of the United States is one of the major surprises of the new
rating system," says Christopher Murray, M.D., Ph.D., Director of WHO's Global
Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. "Basically, you die earlier and spend
more time disabled if you’re an American rather than a member of most other
advanced countries."

The WHO cites various causes for why the United States ranks relatively low
among wealthy nations. These reasons include:

In the United States, some groups, such as Native Americans, rural African
Americans and the inner city poor, have extremely poor health, more
characteristic of a poor developing country rather than a rich industrialized
one.
The HIV epidemic causes a higher proportion of death and disability to U.S.
young and middle-aged than in most other advanced countries. HIV-AIDS cut three
months from the healthy life expectancy of male American babies born in 1999,
and one month from female lives;
The U.S. is one of the leading countries for cancers relating to tobacco,
especially lung cancer Tobacco use also causes chronic lung disease.
A high coronary heart disease rate, which has dropped in recent years but
remains high;
Fairly high levels of violence, especially of homicides, when compared to other
industrial countries.
All of the bottom 10 countries were in sub-Saharan Africa, where the HIV-AIDS
epidemic is rampant. In ascending order beginning with 191, those countries were
Sierra Leona, 25.9 years of healthy life for babies born in 1999; Niger, 29.1;
Malawi, 29.4; Zambia, 30.3; Botswana, 32.3; Uganda, 32.7; Rwanda, 32.8;
Zimbabwe, 32.9; Mali, 33.1; and Ethiopia, 33.5.

The overall life expectancy in sub-Saharan Africa has dropped precipitously over
the past 10 years, mostly because of the AIDS epidemic, the WHO says. Life
expectancy dropped for female babies from 51.1 years to 46.3 years. For males,
the level dropped from 47.3 years to 44.8 years.

AIDS is now the leading cause of death in Sub-Saharan Africa, far surpassing the
traditional deadly diseases of malaria, tuberculosis, pneumonia and diarrheal
disease. AIDS killed 2.2 million Africans in 1999, versus 300,000 AIDS deaths 10
years previously.

"Healthy life expectancy in some African countries is dropping back to levels we
haven’t seen in advanced countries since Medieval times," says Alan Lopez,
Coordinator of WHO’s Epidemiology and Burden of Disease Team. "This is just one
example why the WHO decided to measure healthy life expectancy for all member
countries using DALE for the first time, to give a truer picture of where good
health reigns, and where it doesn’t."

Life expectancy in several countries in southern Africa has been cut 15-20 years
off what the WHO would expect it to be in Africa without HIV. Other African
countries have lost 5-10 years of life expectancy because of HIV.

"The DALE system is simple," says Dr. Lopez. "In the old system, we measured a
total life expectancy based on the average numbers of years males and females
could expect to live in each country. However, people don’t live all those years
in perfect health. At some point in your life, you will have some level of
disability. These years with disability are weighted according to their level of
severity to estimate the total equivalent lost years of good health. You
subtract this from total life expectancy, and what remains is the expected
number of years of healthy life."

This is the first time that anyone has measured every country’s healthy life
expectancy using the DALE system.

High-ranking countries

Several factors go into making Japan number one in the rankings. One is the low
rate of heart disease, associated with the traditional low fat diet. The
national diet is changing, with high fat foods such as red meat becoming common.
The effect of tobacco has also been mild until recently, with low lung cancer
rates. These rates for men are expected to jump in coming years as the long-term
effects of the post-World War II smoking popularity begin to hit.

In Australia, smoking rates have dropped sharply from their earlier peaks,
leading to lower lung cancer and heart problem rates.

France registered high because of the health of its women, which pulled up the
overall average.

French women never smoked in any large numbers until recently. Many young French
women, however, have begun smoking, which will lead to rapid increases in lung
cancer rates and other diseases associated with tobacco in 10 to 20 years.
French men are already suffering from growing rates of these diseases from
tobacco.

Sweden ranks high because of its health care system and because tobacco use is
relatively low.

Women Living Longer, Healthier

Studies have shown consistently that as countries get richer, male mortality
tends to decline less than female mortality. This WHO study shows that the same
patterns hold when healthy life expectancies are measured.

In the early 1900s, the gap between female and male life expectancy was 2-3
years in richer countries around the world. By 1999, women were living on
average 7-8 years more than men in those same countries.

Women are generally more health conscious while in rising economies, men have
much higher smoking rates and exercise much less. Women have been living longer
and healthier lives in richer countries basically because they have always
smoked less than men, the WHO says. Women in these countries have been smoking
much more in recent years, which will translate into higher disability and death
rates in the coming years, the WHO warns. In addition, men in richer countries
tend to have poorer diets than women do, and men exercise much less than did
their grandfathers.

In poorer countries, men are victims of more disabling injuries than women. They
also get more diseases than women, for a variety of reasons.

Regional Results

North African and Middle East -- Males and females have similar levels of
healthy life expectancy, which is unusual. Also, the position of women in these
societies is often not good, Less care is given to female children, and they
have a higher risk for reproductive deaths than in other countries.

In Saudi Arabia, the overall healthy life expectancy is 64.5 years -- 65.1 for
male babies and 64.0 for female babies. In Bahrain, the overall healthy life
expectancy is 64.4, but 63.9 for male babies and 64.9 for female babies; Qatar,
63.5 overall, and 64.2 for male babies, 62.8 for females; and Kuwait, 63.2
overall, with 63.0 for male babies and 63.4 for female babies.

East Asia – China has 20 percent of the world population, so that it is of major
significance that the Chinese have a fairly good healthy life expectancy, at
62.3 years, 63.3 years for women and 61.2 for men. "This is a very impressive
performance for that level of income," says Dr. Lopez.

Russia -- Healthy life expectancy is a fair 66.4 for female babies but just 56.1
years for males. This is one of the widest sex gaps in the world. The most
common explanation is the high incidence of male alcohol abuse, which led to
high rates of accidents, violence and cardiovascular disease. From 1987 to 1994,
the risk of premature death increased by 70% for Russian males. Since 1994, life
expectancy has been improving for males.

Similar rates exist for other major countries of the former Soviet Union. In
Ukraine, female babies can expect to live an equivalent of 67.5 years of healthy
life versus 58.5 years for male babies. In Belarus, the rates are 67.2 years for
female babies and 56.2 years for male babies.

Southeast Asia -- Countries of the region have produced very mixed results. Viet
Nam has been improving dramatically in health profiles and healthy life
expectancy, rising to 58.2 years, while Thailand has not improved significantly
over the past decade, though it is still ahead of Viet Nam at 60.2 years.
Myanmar has not done very well, with a healthy life expectancy of just 52 years,
substantially behind its Southeast Asian neighbors. This shows that even
countries with the same levels of income can have very different healthy life
expectancies.

Latin America -- Cuba has the highest healthy life expectancy in the region, at
68.4 years, near U.S. levels. It is followed by Uruguay at 67.0 years; Argentina
at 66.7 years and Costa Rica at 66.7 years. Brazil is split, with a high healthy
life expectancy in its southern half, and a lower one in the north. The total
average is a relatively low 59.1 years, at 55.2 for men and 62.9 for female
babies.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Christopher Murray, M.D., Ph.D., Director of WHO's Global Programme on Evidence
for Health Policy, is available for telephone interviews on Thursday and Friday,
June 1-2. Please call 703-820-2244 to schedule time.)

Contact: Marshall Hoffman (703) 820-2244 Home (703) 533-8482



2000 Press Releases | 2000 Note for the Press
1999 Press Releases | 1999 Note for the Press |
Fact sheets
| Information Office | En français

Copyright Š WHO/OMS | Contact INF | Contact WHO




Copyright Š WHO/OMS | Contact INF | Contact WHO

















wózki dziecięce kredyt dla firm banki lokaty pozycjonowanie muzyka