|
Whatever happened to the Eschaton? (OT again, sorry!)
2004-11-11 00:32:45
Anyone else remember that? Timewave zero, novelty theory, 2012 and all that?
I looked at Terrence Mckenna's website, and now there's a big essay up there debunking the premises of timewave zero and the whole 2012 date. Does nobody care about that anymore, is it just old news (not novel anymore?). Any thoughts? Love Amido
2004-11-10 17:02:38
"Amido" news:Nqykd.818$fI4.86@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net... > Anyone else remember that? Timewave zero, novelty theory, 2012 and all > that? > > I looked at Terrence Mckenna's website, and now there's a big essay up > there > debunking the premises of timewave zero and the whole 2012 date. 2012 was significant for several reasons. Indeed, I would presume that Terrence got interested in time wave because its date coincided with that of the mayan calendar, the entry into the galactic core, and etc. > > Does nobody care about that anymore, is it just old news (not novel > anymore?). Don't know. I don't think about it much, but I still find the topic somewhat interesting. > > Any thoughts? Only those. > > Love > > Amido >
2004-11-11 03:11:33
"MycoloTeur" news:9Tykd.92791$bk1.62817@fed1read05... > > "Amido" > news:Nqykd.818$fI4.86@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net... > > Anyone else remember that? Timewave zero, novelty theory, 2012 and all > > that? > > > > I looked at Terrence Mckenna's website, and now there's a big essay up > > there > > debunking the premises of timewave zero and the whole 2012 date. > > 2012 was significant for several reasons. Indeed, I would presume that > Terrence got interested in time wave because its date coincided with that > the mayan calendar, the entry into the galactic core, and etc. Actually, he came up with the timewave himself, sometime in the 70's i believe - it was a kind of vision. It was only later that the mayan date came into the picture, adding 'external validity' as it were. I'm sure I have a talk where Terrence says this himself. > > Does nobody care about that anymore, is it just old news (not novel > > anymore?). > > Don't know. I don't think about it much, but I still find the topic > interesting. Yeah. The notion of Fractal Time (a premise of the Timewave) seems very significant with the Salvia experience - seeing as that eternal realities can be experienced within 30 seconds or so of 'ordinary' time. Know what I'm trying to get at? > > Any thoughts? > > Only those. Thanks for them. Love Amido
2004-11-10 19:27:48
"Amido" news:FLAkd.1031$fI4.161@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net... > > "MycoloTeur" > news:9Tykd.92791$bk1.62817@fed1read05... >> >> "Amido" >> news:Nqykd.818$fI4.86@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net... >> > Anyone else remember that? Timewave zero, novelty theory, 2012 and all >> > that? >> > >> > I looked at Terrence Mckenna's website, and now there's a big essay up >> > there >> > debunking the premises of timewave zero and the whole 2012 date. >> >> 2012 was significant for several reasons. Indeed, I would presume that >> Terrence got interested in time wave because its date coincided with that > of >> the mayan calendar, the entry into the galactic core, and etc. > > Actually, he came up with the timewave himself, sometime in the 70's i > believe - it was a kind of vision. It was only later that the mayan date > came into the picture, adding 'external validity' as it were. I'm sure I > have a talk where Terrence says this himself. You would have to show me that, and even if you did, I would just say he was mistaken. Perhaps excepting the galactic core entry. But the mayan calendar has always ended at 2012 and various people have known it for a long time. > >> > Does nobody care about that anymore, is it just old news (not novel >> > anymore?). >> >> Don't know. I don't think about it much, but I still find the topic > somewhat >> interesting. > > Yeah. > > The notion of Fractal Time (a premise of the Timewave) seems very > significant with the Salvia experience - seeing as that eternal realities > can be experienced within 30 seconds or so of 'ordinary' time. > > Know what I'm trying to get at? Yes, and while I would not be at all suprised if fractals have a role in nearly everything, I can not relate to it in any direct way at the moment. i.e., you may or may not be correct. I have no way of knowing. I do believe that our perception of time can be characterized fractally. Particularly with respect to the idea of infinite granularity. Certainly, my current belief is that the universe is basically fractal in nature, and that that is why we will never undertand it fully. Every time we reduce the scale we find a new layer. I think that may not ever end until you get back to the original superparticle representing the state of the universe at the big bang. (entirely speculative, but something like that strikes me as likely at this point). > >> > Any thoughts? >> >> Only those. > > Thanks for them. My pleasure. Thanks for the stimulation. Love and Light > > Love > > Amido > >
2004-11-11 13:03:31
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:11:33 GMT in
>I'm sure I >have a talk where Terrence says this himself. then it must be true.
2004-11-11 16:32:33
"rubio" news:DqJkd.434$G36.23@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:11:33 GMT in > > > > >I'm sure I > >have a talk where Terrence says this himself. > > then it must be true. lol. yes! :) Love Amido
2004-11-11 19:59:41
> Yes, and while I would not be at all suprised if fractals have a role > in nearly everything, I can not relate to it in any direct way at the > moment. i.e., you may or may not be correct. I have no way of knowing. > I do believe that our perception of time can be characterized > fractally. Particularly with respect to the idea of infinite > granularity. Certainly, my current belief is that the universe is > basically fractal in nature, and that that is why we will never > undertand it fully. Every time we reduce the scale we find a new > layer. I think that may not ever end until you get back to the > original superparticle representing the state of the universe at the > big bang. (entirely speculative, but something like that strikes me as > likely at this point). > > >> >>> > Any thoughts? >>> >>> Only those. >> >> Thanks for them. > > My pleasure. Thanks for the stimulation. > > Love and Light >> >> Love >> >> Amido >> >> > > > Greetings to the group.. Long time lurker here.. here is an interesting cosmology link.... http://www.mu6.com/index1.html See ya in the vortex... Have a great day! |
wszystko o sejmie rachunek firmowy leasing maszyn Bielizna private banking nieruchomości |
